Chilosi, David and Volckart, Oliver (2010) Good or bad money?: debasement, society and the state in the late Middle Ages. Economic History Working Papers, 140/10. Department of Economic History, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Download (348Kb) | Preview
This paper revisits the question of debasement by analysing a newly compiled dataset with a novel approach, as well as employing conventional methods. It finds that mercantile influence on monetary policies favoured relative stability, and wage-payers did not typically gain from silver debasement. Excess demand for bullion was not a major cause of debasement. Yet monetary issues were important. Warfare made the debasement of silver but not of gold more likely. Regime types had an importance comparable to that of warfare: Princes debased silver more often than monetary unions and especially city-states. It is likely that fiscal debasements were more frequent in principalities, not least because princes debased for fiscal reasons also in the absence exceptional needs. The conclusion discusses the implications of the findings.
|Item Type:||Monograph (Working Paper)|
|Additional Information:||© 2010 David Chilosi and Oliver Volckart|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
H Social Sciences > HG Finance
J Political Science > JC Political theory
D History General and Old World > D History (General) > D111 Medieval History
|Sets:||Departments > Economic History
Collections > Economists Online
|Date Deposited:||11 May 2010 15:26|
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|