Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Leading the party: coordination, direction, and communication

Dewan, Torun and Myatt, David P. (2007) Leading the party: coordination, direction, and communication. American Political Science Review, 101 (4). pp. 827-845. ISSN 1537-5943

Full text not available from this repository.

Identification Number: 10.1017/S0003055407070451


Party activists face a coordination problem: a critical mass—–a barrier to coordination—–must advocate a single policy alternative if the party is to succeed. The need for direction is the degree to which the merits of the alternatives respond to the underlying fundamentals of the party’s environment. An individual’s ability to assess the fundamentals is his sense of direction. These three factors—–the barriers to coordination, the need for direction, and an individual’s sense of direction—–combine to form an index of both the desirability and the feasibility of leadership. We offer insights into Michels’ Iron Law: a sovereign party conference gives way to leadership by an individual or oligarchy if and only if the leadership index is sufficiently high. Leadership enhances the clarity of intraparty communication, but weakens the response of policy choices to the party’s environment. Our model can also be applied to the coordination problems faced by instrumental voters in plurality-rule elections, and so relates to the psychological effect of Duverger’s Law.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2007 American Political Science Association
Divisions: Government
Subjects: J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)
Date Deposited: 16 Dec 2009 11:45
Last Modified: 24 Jan 2024 18:33

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item