Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

The impact of internationally mandatory laws on the enforceability of arbitration agreements

Kleinheisterkamp, Jan ORCID: 0000-0003-4037-8860 (2009) The impact of internationally mandatory laws on the enforceability of arbitration agreements. LSE law, society and economy working papers (22-2009). Department of Law, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Download (296kB) | Preview


This article examines the impact that internationally mandatory rules of the forum state may have on the effectiveness of arbitration agreements. This question arises when claims are based on such internationally mandatory rules, but the parties submitted their contract to a foreign law. The specific problems of conflicts of economic regulation are illustrated and discussed on the basis of Belgian and German court decisions relating to commercial distribution and agency agreements. European courts have adopted a restrictive practice of denying the efficacy of such tandems of choice-of-law and arbitration clauses if there is a strong probability that their internationally mandatory rules will not be applied in foreign procedures. This article shows that neither this approach nor the much more pro-arbitration biased solutions proposed by critics are convincing. It elaborates a third solution, which allows national courts to reconcile their legislator’s intention to enforce a given public policy with the parties’ original intention to arbitrate and to optimize the effectiveness of both public interests and arbitration.

Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2009 The author
Divisions: Law
Subjects: J Political Science > JX International law
Date Deposited: 24 Nov 2009 17:05
Last Modified: 15 Sep 2023 23:16

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics