Cooper, Zachary N., Nelson, Robert M. and Friedman Ross, Lainie (2004) Certificates of confidentiality in research: rationale and usage. Genetic Testing, 8 (2). pp. 214-220. ISSN 1945-0265
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Certificates of confidentiality (COCs) are a tool to protect researchers from being compelled to release identifying information about their subjects. Whereas institutional review board (IRB) review and informed consent procedures are mandatory tools to protect human subjects, COCs are voluntary. There are limited data about who procures COCs and why, and whether they are useful. Three Institutes of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) provided data on 114 research projects that had received COCs. Eighty-three researchers had procured a single COC and 11 researchers had procured 31 COCs. One hundred and four (91%) of the COCs were obtained by researchers at academic sites, and 17 institutions collectively accounted for 82 COCs. The most commonly cited sources of information about COCs came from colleagues (n = 18, 35%) and previous experience (n = 17, 33%). The most common reasons for procuring a COC were that the research involved genetics (n = 28, 54%), the research could lead to social stigmatization or discrimination (n = 22, 42%), or the research could damage an individual's financial standing, employability, or reputation (n = 21, 40%). These findings show that COCs are often congregated within institutions and by particular individuals. This may be because others are unaware of COCs or because others do not believe they are necessary or useful.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.liebertpub.com/products/product.aspx?pi... |
| Additional Information: | © 2004 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. |
| Divisions: | LSE Health |
| Subjects: | Q Science > Q Science (General) |
| Date Deposited: | 29 Sep 2009 14:25 |
| Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 21:49 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/25305 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
