Klug, Francesca (2009) "Solidity or wind?" What's on the menu in the bill of rights debate? The political quarterly, 80 (3). pp. 420-426. ISSN 0032-3179
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
This article examines the pronouncements and positions of the leading political parties on the Human Rights Act and the proposals for a new British Bill of Rights and Responsibilities. It analyses the main arguments made in support of a British Bill of Rights and Responsibilities, which are advanced around five main issues: security, the judges, parliamentary sovereignty, responsibilities and 'British rights'. The article was written before the government published the Green Paper Rights and Responsibilities: developing our constitutional framework in March 2009 and provides a political context with which to analyse it.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0032-3179 |
| Additional Information: | © 2009 The Political Quarterly Publishing Co. Ltd. |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | human rights, bill of rights, Human Rights Act, British constitution |
| Library of Congress subject classification: | K Law > KD England and Wales |
| Sets: | Research centres and groups > LSE Global Governance |
| Rights: | http://www.lse.ac.uk/library/rights/LSERO.htm |
| URL: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/25118/ |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Record administration - authorised staff only |
