Elsholtz, Christian and List, Christian ORCID: 0000-0003-1627-800X (2005) A simple proof of Sen's possibility theorem on majority decisions. Elemente der Mathematik, 60 (2). pp. 45-56. ISSN 1420-8962
|
PDF
Download (259kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Condorcet’s voting paradox shows that pairwise majority voting may lead to cyclical majority preferences. In a famous paper, Sen (1966) identified a general condition on a profile of individual preference orderings, called triplewise value-restriction, which is sufficient for the avoidance of such cycles. This note aims to make Sen’s result easily accessible. We provide an elementary proof of Sen's possibility theorem and a simple reformulation of Sen’s condition. We discuss how Sen’s condition is logically related to a number of precursors. Finally, we state a necessary and sufficient condition for the avoidance of cycles, and suggest that, although there is still some logical space between that condition and Sen’s sufficient condition, Sen’s condition cannot be further generalized in an appealing way.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | http://www.ems-ph.org/journals/journal.php?jrn=em |
Additional Information: | © 2005 European Mathematical Society |
Divisions: | Government Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method CPNSS |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic Q Science > QA Mathematics |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jul 2008 14:33 |
Last Modified: | 13 Sep 2024 21:56 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/19610 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |