Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Financing mental health services in low - and middle - income countries

Dixon, Anna, McDaid, David ORCID: 0000-0003-0744-2664, Knapp, Martin ORCID: 0000-0003-1427-0215 and Curran, Claire (2006) Financing mental health services in low - and middle - income countries. Health Policy and Planning, 21 (3). pp. 171-182. ISSN 0268-1080

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1093/heapol/czl004

Abstract

Mental disorders account for a significant and growing proportion of the global burden of disease and yet remain a low priority for public financing in health systems globally. In many low-income countries, formal mental health services are paid for directly by patients out-of-pocket and in middle-income countries undergoing transition there has been a decline in coverage. The paper explores the impact of health care financing arrangements on the efficient and equitable utilization of mental health services. Through a review of the literature and a number of country case studies, the paper examines the impact of financing mental health services from out-of-pocket payments, private health insurance, social health insurance and taxation. The implications for the development of financing systems in low- and middle-income countries are discussed. International evidence suggests that charging patients for mental health services results in levels of use which are below socially efficient levels as the benefits of the services are distributed according to ability to pay, resulting in inequitable access to care. Private health insurance poses three main problems for mental health service users: exclusion of mental health benefits, limited access to those without employment and refusal to insure pre-existing conditions. Social health insurance may offer protection to those with mental health problems. However, in many low- and middle-income countries, eligibility is based on contributions and limited to those in formal employment (therefore excluding many with mental health problems). Tax-funded systems provide universal coverage in theory. However, the quality and distribution of publicly financed health care services makes access difficult in practice, particularly for rural poor communities.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://heapol.oxfordjournals.org/
Additional Information: © 2006 Oxford University Press
Divisions: LSE Health
Care Policy and Evaluation Centre
Health Policy
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Date Deposited: 16 Jul 2008 14:01
Last Modified: 11 Dec 2024 23:00
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/19523

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item