Bromwich, Michael, Benston, G.J and Wagenhofer, Alfred (2006) Principles-versus-rules-based accounting standards:The FASB's standard setting strategy. Abacus, 42 (2). pp. 165-188. ISSN 0001-3072
In response to criticism of rules-based accounting standards and Section 108(d) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC proposed principles-based (or ‘objectives-oriented’) standards. We identify several shortcomings with this approach and focus on two of them. First, the format (type) of a standard is dependent on the contents of what the standard regulates. Given the asset/liability approach combined with fair values, we argue that the combination of this measurement concept with principles-based standards is inconsistent because it requires significant guidance for management judgment. Second, we propose the inclusion of a true-and-fair override as a necessary requirement for any format that is more than ‘principles-only’ to deal with inconsistencies between principles and guidance. We discuss the benefits of this override and present evidence from the United Kingdom's experience.
|Additional Information:||© 2006 Wiley-Blackwell|
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||accounting standards, FASB, principles, rules, rules-based|
|Library of Congress subject classification:||H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting|
|Sets:||Departments > Accounting and Finance|
Actions (login required)
|Record administration - authorised staff only|