Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Principles-versus-rules-based accounting standards:The FASB's standard setting strategy

Bromwich, Michael, Benston, G.J and Wagenhofer, Alfred (2006) Principles-versus-rules-based accounting standards:The FASB's standard setting strategy. Abacus, 42 (2). pp. 165-188. ISSN 0001-3072

Full text not available from this repository.
Identification Number: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00196.x


In response to criticism of rules-based accounting standards and Section 108(d) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC proposed principles-based (or ‘objectives-oriented’) standards. We identify several shortcomings with this approach and focus on two of them. First, the format (type) of a standard is dependent on the contents of what the standard regulates. Given the asset/liability approach combined with fair values, we argue that the combination of this measurement concept with principles-based standards is inconsistent because it requires significant guidance for management judgment. Second, we propose the inclusion of a true-and-fair override as a necessary requirement for any format that is more than ‘principles-only’ to deal with inconsistencies between principles and guidance. We discuss the benefits of this override and present evidence from the United Kingdom's experience.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 2006 Wiley-Blackwell
Divisions: LSE
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting
Date Deposited: 29 Jul 2008 14:18
Last Modified: 22 Feb 2024 21:33

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item