Bromwich, Michael, Benston, G.J and Wagenhofer, Alfred (2006) Principles-versus-rules-based accounting standards:The FASB's standard setting strategy. Abacus, 42 (2). pp. 165-188. ISSN 0001-3072
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
In response to criticism of rules-based accounting standards and Section 108(d) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC proposed principles-based (or ‘objectives-oriented’) standards. We identify several shortcomings with this approach and focus on two of them. First, the format (type) of a standard is dependent on the contents of what the standard regulates. Given the asset/liability approach combined with fair values, we argue that the combination of this measurement concept with principles-based standards is inconsistent because it requires significant guidance for management judgment. Second, we propose the inclusion of a true-and-fair override as a necessary requirement for any format that is more than ‘principles-only’ to deal with inconsistencies between principles and guidance. We discuss the benefits of this override and present evidence from the United Kingdom's experience.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Official URL: | http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/abacus |
| Additional Information: | © 2006 Wiley-Blackwell |
| Divisions: | LSE |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting |
| Date Deposited: | 29 Jul 2008 14:18 |
| Last Modified: | 08 Oct 2024 01:51 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/14847 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
