How to distinguish human error from election fraud: evidence from the 2019 Malawi election

Ahlback, Johan ORCID: 0000-0003-3466-7754 and Jablonski, Ryan S. ORCID: 0000-0002-7344-6738 (2025) How to distinguish human error from election fraud: evidence from the 2019 Malawi election. British Journal of Political Science, 55. ISSN 0007-1234

Text (how-to-distinguish-human-error-from-election-fraud-evidence-from-the-2019-malawi-election) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB)

Abstract

Voters and politicians often blame tallying irregularities on fraud, undermining perceptions of democratic and electoral credibility. Yet such irregularities also result from capacity failures and human error. We introduce several methods to assess competing causes of tallying irregularities leveraging the quasi-random administration of polling stations. Using these methods, we revisit the case of the 2019 Malawian presidential election which was famously canceled by the High Court due to widespread result-sheet edits and accusations of fraud. Contrary to the dominant consensus, we do not find evidence that edits were motivated by fraud or that they benefited the incumbent. Instead, we show that edits increased in proportion to the complexity of filling in result-sheets, suggesting a dominant role for human error. In addition to reinterpreting a historically important election, we also make the case that policy efforts to improve electoral credibility could productively be reallocated towards electoral administration rather than anti-fraud measures.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions:	Methodology Government
Subjects:	J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General) J Political Science > JQ Political institutions Asia, Africa, Australia, Pacific
Date Deposited:	10 Sep 2025 15:06
Last Modified:	11 Nov 2025 14:12
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/129465

Actions (login required)

View Item