Semieniuk, Gregor, Weber, Isabella M., Weaver, Iain S., Wasner, Evan, Braun, Benjamin ORCID: 0000-0002-5186-5923, Holden, Philip B., Salas, Pablo, Mercure, Jean-Francois and Edwards, Neil R.
(2025)
Best of times, worst of times: record fossil-fuel profits, inflation and inequality.
Energy Research and Social Science, 127.
ISSN 2214-6296
![]() |
Text (1-s2.0-S2214629625003020-main)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (3MB) |
Abstract
The 2022 oil and gas crisis resulted in record fossil-fuel profits globally that rehabilitated the oil and gas industry, obstructed the energy transition and contributed to inflation, but their magnitude and beneficiaries have been insufficiently understood. Here we show the size of profits across countries and their distribution across socio-economic groups within the United States, using company income statements, comprehensive ownership data and a network model for propagating profits via shareholdings. We estimate that globally, net income in publicly listed oil and gas companies alone reached US$916 billion in 2022, with the United States the biggest beneficiary with claims on US$301 billion, more than U.S. investments of US$267 billion in the low carbon economy that year. In a network of U.S. shareholdings with 252,433 nodes including privately held U.S. companies, 50 % of profits went to the wealthiest 1 % of individuals, predominantly through direct shareholdings and private company ownership. In contrast the bottom 50 % only received 1 %. The incremental U.S. fossil-fuel profits in 2022 relative to 2021 were enough to increase the disposable income of the wealthiest Americans by several percent and compensate a substantial part of their purchasing power loss from inflation that year, thereby exacerbating inflation inequality. These profits also reinforced existing racial and ethnic inequalities and inequalities between groups with different educational attainments. We discuss how an excess profit tax could be used to both lower inequality and accelerate the energy transition as increasing geopolitical tensions and climate impacts threaten continued volatility in oil and gas markets.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2025 The Author(s) |
Divisions: | European Institute |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions |
JEL classification: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q30 - General Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies |
Date Deposited: | 20 Aug 2025 13:48 |
Last Modified: | 11 Sep 2025 12:30 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/129170 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |