Predicting negotiation behavior to support decision making in civil dispute resolution

Zhang, Wen, Shi, Jingwen, Wang, Xiaojun and Wynn, Henry ORCID: 0000-0002-6448-1080 (2025) Predicting negotiation behavior to support decision making in civil dispute resolution. Annals of Operations Research. ISSN 1572-9338

Text (s10479-025-06711-8) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (3MB)

• https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway...
• Scopus publication

Abstract

Despite the advocacy of leveraging data analytics to improve operational efficiency, there is a paucity of research on how analytical technologies afford professional service innovation and enhancement. We propose a data-driven decision support framework for civil litigation negotiation, which is a routine business activity in legal service firms. It is typically conducted in a traditional manner with the conflicting parties drawing on their past experiences and prior knowledge to guide decision-making. This model predicts human negotiation behavior based on historical records and incorporates the behavioral insights into the decision-making process. We introduce a sequential directed acyclic graph to characterize the causal relationships between offers and employ different approaches to predicting the opponent’s next moves. By integrating utility analysis, each player can decide whether to accept the opponent’s offer or counter back. The proposed framework is illustrated through a field experiment based on the UK MoJ Portal for handling low-cost injury claims and 88 cases with complete negotiation history. We find that better outcomes for both parties can be delivered by implementing the proposed model. The analysis result also represents convincing evidence that low-cost cases should ideally be settled out of the court via negotiation to maximize shared benefits. This paradigm could be easily generalized to other types of civil dispute resolutions negotiation to enhance both operational efficiency and service quality.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	Q Science > QA Mathematics K Law > K Law (General)
Date Deposited:	05 Aug 2025 07:39
Last Modified:	25 Aug 2025 16:04
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/129029

Actions (login required)

View Item