An international validation of the Stigma Impact Scale with people with dementia

Bhatt, Jem, Evans‐Lacko, Sara ORCID: 0000-0003-4691-2630, Scior, Katrina and Saunders, Rob (2025) An international validation of the Stigma Impact Scale with people with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 40 (7). ISSN 0885-6230

Text - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (451kB)

• Scopus publication

Abstract

Objective: A robust psychometric instrument is imperative to measure the devastating impact of self‐stigma in dementia to adequately inform policy and practice. Our objective was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Stigma Impact Scale in a global sample of people with dementia. Method: Data were analysed from the World Alzheimer Report including 710 participants in 42 countries who completed the SIS. Detailed psychometric analyses of the SIS included estimating reliability, convergent validity with the Warwick‐Edinburgh mental Well‐being Scale (WEMWBS) and the Dementia Quality of Life instrument (DQoL), the factor structure of the measure (through both exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis). Results: The SIS and its subscales had ‘good’ to ‘excellent’ internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha: 0.883–0.943). However, convergent validity correlations were not in the predicted direction; no significant correlations were noted between the SIS and the WEMWBS and DQoL. Factor analysis suggested marginal improvements in global fit indices for the observed model compared to the theoretical model, though none met the thresholds for acceptable fit. The final proposed model had three factors: rejection and secrecy, loneliness and belonging and perceived social isolation. Most SIS items were strongly endorsed by participants. Conclusion: The SIS is the most robustly tested instrument measuring self‐stigma in dementia. The SIS has good to excellent reliability and relevance to the target population, however future work is required to improve the factor structure of the scale. Further the results of the validity testing pose a number of theoretical and empirical questions for future research.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions:	Care Policy and Evaluation Centre
Subjects:	R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Date Deposited:	07 Jul 2025 10:24
Last Modified:	31 Jul 2025 00:03
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/128649

Actions (login required)

View Item