Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Theory, praxis and politics in law and society research: reflections on the Cotterrell‐Nelken debate

Choudhury, Nafay ORCID: 0000-0003-2375-5003 (2025) Theory, praxis and politics in law and society research: reflections on the Cotterrell‐Nelken debate. Journal of Law and Society. ISSN 0263-323X

[img] Text (Journal of Law and Society - 2025 - CHOUDHURY - Theory praxis and politics in law and society research Reflections on the) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (169kB)
Identification Number: 10.1111/jols.70004

Abstract

In this paper, I provide reflections on the continuing value of the Cotterrell–Nelken debate within law and society research. Specifically, I pick up on two discussion points that animate this debate. First, the debate quintessentially probes the identity of the discipline of the sociology of law. In this regard, it is very much concerned about how the boundaries of a discipline are formed. I reflect on how this issue continues to persist across law and society research, as questions on the boundary formation and dissolution of different concepts and categories are ubiquitous and an animating feature of the field. Second, I reflect on how lurking behind the questions raised by the debate are political considerations that structure legal and socio‐legal analysis. The Cotterrell–Nelken debate raises vexing questions on what law is and what law ought to be, without clearly resolving them. Indeed, any resolution seems futile and instead points to the political choices that underpin different understandings of the law and its relationship to other social scientific fields. Across law and society research, vexing questions about the nature and function of law within specific settings may relate to political choices that receive inadequate scholarly attention. Law and society research would thus benefit from an agenda that places the politics underlying different legal discourses into plain view.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions: Law School
Subjects: K Law
J Political Science
Date Deposited: 16 Jun 2025 15:30
Last Modified: 21 Jul 2025 08:57
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/128418

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics