Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

In their God we trust: religious cognition increases cooperation across religious divides

Pasek, Michael H., Vishkin, Allon, Lehner, Anne, Shackleford, Crystal M., Hartley, Starlett and Ginges, Jeremy ORCID: 0000-0003-2212-5608 (2025) In their God we trust: religious cognition increases cooperation across religious divides. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. ISSN 0022-3514 (In Press)

[img] Text (In their God we trust JPSP 2025) - Accepted Version
Pending embargo until 1 January 2100.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Belief in moralizing Gods is widely thought to foster cooperation between coreligionists, but there is disagreement regarding whether this effect is limited to the religious ingroup or if it extends to members of religious outgroups. Here we report the results of a cross-cultural research program that demonstrates that people who think about God (1) are more trusted by both coreligionists and members of other religious groups, and (2) typically behave in a more trustworthy manner towards both ingroups and outgroups. We ran three preregistered studies (N = 1,784) with Christians and Muslims in the U.S., Jews and Muslims in Israel, and Christians and Hindus in Fiji. Our contexts varied in multiple ways, including the level of intergroup conflict. Using two-player trust games involving real money, we varied whether participants interacted with ingroup or outgroup members and whether reciprocators considered God when deciding how much to return to trustors. We find in each context that making moralizing God beliefs of one player salient enhances both intragroup and intergroup cooperation. Our findings add to a nascent literature documenting the potential for religious cognition to extend moral norms across intergroup divides. We discuss implications for theories of the emergence of moralizing gods, and implications for public debates about religious pluralism in diverse societies.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BL Religion
Date Deposited: 04 Jun 2025 11:36
Last Modified: 04 Jun 2025 11:36
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/128305

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics