Beliefs about what disadvantaged groups would do with power shape advantaged groups' (un)willingness to relinquish it

Kachanoff, Frank Jake, Sheehy-Skeffington, Jennifer ORCID: 0000-0003-0372-4867, Ho, Arnold, Richeson, Jennifer and Kteily, Nour (2025) Beliefs about what disadvantaged groups would do with power shape advantaged groups' (un)willingness to relinquish it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 128 (5). 1103 - 1141. ISSN 0022-3514

Text (PSP-I-2023-0827_R3 (2)_final accepted manuscript) - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (3MB)

• https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway...
• Scopus publication

Abstract

Dominant groups often resist possible changes to the hierarchical status quo. Might such tendencies be partly rooted in negative—yet potentially malleable—meta-beliefs about how disempowered groups would use power if they gained control? We investigate these questions across three studies and eight independent samples (Total N = 7,460 analyzed responses) in the context of Black–White relations in the United States. Specifically, we examine White Americans’ meta-beliefs about whether Black Americans desire power to structure society into a hierarchy in which they are dominant versus to institute equality for all groups (i.e., meta-dominance beliefs). Across six cross-sectional subsamples (Study 1, Samples A–F; N = 3,383), we developed and validated a measure of meta-dominance, and found that White Americans varied substantially in their beliefs about how Black Americans would use power. Critically, Whites’ meta-dominance beliefs were uniquely related to their opposition to policies empowering Black Americans as well as their support for efforts to maintain Whites’ position atop the social hierarchy, even when controlling for a range of relevant constructs. In two preregistered experiments among White Americans (Studies 2 and 3; N = 4,077), one of which was a registered report, we tested two possible causal pathways that might explain this relation: (a) “Meta-Dominance Beliefs → Opposition to Black Empowerment” and (b) “Opposition to Black Empowerment → Meta-Dominance Beliefs.” We found evidence in support of the “Meta-Dominance Beliefs → Opposition to Black Empowerment” pathway, but not for the latter Opposition to Black Empowerment → “Meta-Dominance Beliefs” pathway. We discuss our findings’ implications for theories of hierarchy maintenance.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2025 The Author(s)
Divisions:	Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology H Social Sciences > HM Sociology H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
Date Deposited:	03 Jun 2025 08:06
Last Modified:	23 Jun 2025 17:04
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/128287

Actions (login required)

View Item