Stewart, Kitty ORCID: 0000-0001-7744-8741, Andersen, Kate, Patrick, Ruth, Reader, Mary ORCID: 0000-0002-2154-1813 and Reeves, Aaron ORCID: 0000-0001-9114-965X (2024) Does reducing child benefits mean parents work more? A mixed methods study of the labor market effects of the UK’s ‘two child limit’. Social Service Review. ISSN 0037-7961 (In Press)
Text (ssr_accepted_two_child_limit_employment)
- Accepted Version
Pending embargo until 1 January 2100. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Child benefits can play an important role in supporting families during a life-stage of increased household needs. However, they may also have negative effects on parental work incentives, potentially limiting their impact on child poverty. We examine the employment effects of a substantial benefit cut affecting larger families in the UK. The ‘two-child limit’ restricted means-tested child benefits to two children only, affecting new births from April 2017. Using difference-in-difference models, we find no positive impact on employment rates, with some models even pointing to negative effects. Among coupled mothers who are already working we do find small increases in working hours. Qualitative research with affected families helps make sense of these limited effects, indicating inelastic labor market responses due to strong commitment to unpaid care, challenges of caregiving responsibilities, and gaps in suitable childcare. We further find that hardship linked to the policy may make labor market engagement harder for some parents.
Actions (login required)
View Item |