Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

To trust or not to trust? How Hong Kong protesters build and maintain trust in a leaderless movement

Madsen, Jens ORCID: 0000-0003-2405-8496 and So, Jeanie (2024) To trust or not to trust? How Hong Kong protesters build and maintain trust in a leaderless movement. Culture and Psychology. ISSN 1354-067X

[img] Text (madsen-so-2024-to-trust-or-not-to-trust-how-hong-kong-protesters-build-and-maintain-trust-in-a-leaderless-movement) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (937kB)

Identification Number: 10.1177/1354067X241297290

Abstract

Protesters in leaderless movements face serious challenges when searching for reliable and trustworthy information in risky environments. Without formal structures to validate information, protestors are left to their own to evaluate the trustworthiness of information in a context where fake social media accounts and deception is possible. We interview protesters from the Hong Kong Anti-Extradition Law Amendment Bill movement to uncover how they develop trust in fellow protesters and information channels. We find that trust in collective political actions goes beyond the idea of social trust and include the concept of informational trust. Social and informational trust are intertwined with social media as well as with actual practices online and offline. In addition, the so-called ‘sentinel’ structure emerged organically. Information appears to be verified by multiple anonymous and independent sentinels for protestors to believe it. This is a sophisticated attendance to structural information source dependencies. Protestors use a mixture of social, communicative, and dependency cues to decide who and what to trust. They also use social media that has a dual role – simultaneously a community-building information space and a space for misinformation. The paper provides qualitative insight into how protesters deal with social and informational trust in leaderless movements.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2024 The Author(s)
Divisions: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects: J Political Science
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Date Deposited: 04 Oct 2024 09:51
Last Modified: 10 Dec 2024 18:03
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/125620

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics