Jacobson, Laura E., Jayaweera, Ruvani, Footman, Katy, Goodman, Julia M., Gerdts, Caitlin and Darney, Blair G. (2024) Self-reported follow-up care needs can be met in both facility and self-managed abortion: evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Contraception. ISSN 0010-7824
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
Objectives: To understand in-facility follow-up care-seeking behavior among both people who self-managed medication abortions and those who obtained facility-managed care in low-and-middle-income countries. We explore factors that contribute to meeting individual self-reported follow-up care needs, core to person-centered care. Study design: We conducted a qualitative, codebook thematic analysis of 67 in-depth interviews conducted with people who self-managed medication abortions or obtained facility-managed medication abortion care. We first classified individuals as having their follow-up care needs met (not seeking care when the participant felt confident that additional care was not warranted or desired or receiving care if it was desired) or not. Our a priori analytic domains came from the Anderson model of health services utilization - predisposing, enabling, or need factors (perceived and evaluated need for health services) that contributed to having follow-up care needs met or not. We also describe emergent themes within each domain. Results: Most participants (n = 59, 88%) had their follow-up care needs met; half (n = 33, 49%) sought follow-up care in a facility. Prior birth or abortion experiences emerged as predisposing factors for having follow-up care needs met. Having accompaniment support (from activists or hotlines who provide abortion guidance outside of clinical settings), knowing what to expect, and information sources were key enabling factors for having follow-up care needs met. Need factors included flexible follow-up care guidelines. Those who did not have their follow-up care needs met described predisposing negative health system experiences; enabling factors including health system challenges, stigma from providers, and legal risk; and need factors of required follow-up care guidelines. Conclusions: Medication abortion follow-up care experiences are diverse, and individual needs can be met both in and outside of health facilities. Understanding prior experiences, enabling accompaniment support, and considering flexible follow-up care guidelines can support meeting individual follow-up care needs, which is essential to person-centered abortion care. Implications: Follow-up care needs, essential to ensuring access to high-quality abortion services, can be met in both self-managed and in-facility medication abortion models. Policies that require follow-up care when it is not needed or desired by the person can reinforce ideas that self-managed abortion is not safe or effective, despite existing evidence.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | © 2024 Elsevier Inc. |
| Divisions: | Social Policy |
| Subjects: | R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman |
| Date Deposited: | 30 Sep 2024 16:06 |
| Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2024 17:10 |
| URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/125571 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
