Target pressure and corporate scandals: a natural language processing investigation of how organizational culture underlies institutional failures

Reader, Tom W. and Gillespie, Alex ORCID: 0000-0002-0162-1269 (2024) Target pressure and corporate scandals: a natural language processing investigation of how organizational culture underlies institutional failures. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. ISSN 1464-0643

Text (Target pressure and corporate scandals a natural language processing investigation of how organizational culture underlies institutional failures) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (3MB)

• Author
• Scopus publication

Abstract

An organizational culture of pressurizing employees to achieve unrealistic goals (“target pressure”) is often suggested to foster the misconduct and risk-taking that causes institutional failures (corporate scandals, accidents). To conceptualize and investigate this, we gathered anonymous employee online reviews about working in 218 companies (71,830 reviews, containing 4,356,105 words) and developed a natural language processing algorithm to measure the salience of norms for target pressure within the employee reviews. Using this measure, we surfaced and qualitatively analysed sentences in which employees discussed target pressure, and quantitatively tested whether companies with a high target pressure culture (in which target pressure was especially salient in collective thinking) were at greater risk of experiencing a corporate scandal. Our hypothesis was supported. Qualitative analysis found that high target pressure cultures are characterized by norms for three inter-linking elements: overly ambitious targets that are beyond the capability and control of employees, highly consequential targets that generate strain, and expediency in achieving targets, which encourages an “ends justify the means” mentality. Combined, these elements may increase the likelihood of institutional failures by promoting, incentivizing, and normalizing deviant or risky behaviour (i.e. to achieve targets), and implicitly de-prioritizing the importance of safe and ethical conduct.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2024 The Authors
Divisions:	Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Date Deposited:	28 Aug 2024 11:30
Last Modified:	18 Nov 2024 20:24
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/125248

Actions (login required)

View Item