The use and impact of well-being metrics on policymaking: developers' and users' perspectives in Scotland and Italy

Battaglia, Fabio (2024) The use and impact of well-being metrics on policymaking: developers' and users' perspectives in Scotland and Italy. Social Policy and Administration. ISSN 0144-5596

Text (Battaglia_The Use and Impact of Well‐Being Metrics on Policymaking Developers) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (245kB)

• Author
• Scopus publication

Abstract

Gross domestic product (GDP) is frequently used as a proxy for well-being. Such use of GDP is problematic for many reasons, for GDP excludes activities that contribute to well-being and includes others that have a negative impact instead. As a result, a vast array of metrics has been developed to complement or replace it and put well-being at the heart of policymaking. Nonetheless, previous research has shown that their use and impact on policymaking has been limited. This article examines the use and impact of well-being metrics according to their own developers and intended users in the crucial cases of Scotland and Italy, focusing specifically on the two countries' official well-being frameworks. Despite being at the forefront of the well-being debate, both countries have never been studied in this regard before. This article fills this gap, collating views from more than 100 stakeholders, including statisticians, members of interest groups, policymakers and journalists. Findings show that the vast majority of informants could not cite any examples of cases in which either framework impacted on policymaking, or in which they themselves had used these. In some cases, this was due to them not being aware of what such frameworks were in the first place. Those who could identify some examples were those who were or used to be part of the government. Examples would, however, tend to be vague, in some instances remarkable yet merely anecdotal, and still in others the result of an ‘ex-post rationalisation’.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2024 The Author
Divisions:	Social Policy
Subjects:	J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General) H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Date Deposited:	22 Aug 2024 11:24
Last Modified:	18 Nov 2024 20:45
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/124638

Actions (login required)

View Item