Bourguignon, Lea and Mossé, Milan (2025) How to count sore throats. Analysis. ISSN 0003-2638
![]() |
Text (anae068)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (316kB) |
Abstract
Kamm’s sore throat case gives us a choice: save one life or save a distinct life and cure a sore throat. We defend the fairness explanation of the judgement that one should flip a coin to decide whom to save: it is disrespectful to let a sore throat act as a tie-breaker, because an individual would be forced to forgo a 50% fair chance of living (given to them by a coin flip), which cannot be outweighed by any number of sore throats. We show that this explanation of when and why claims can permissibly break ties generates new problem cases for theories of aggregation, including theories that have been thought to accommodate the judgement that one should flip a coin in Kamm’s sore throat case. We then generalize the fairness explanation to cases involving multiple groups.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2025 The Authors |
Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Date Deposited: | 09 Aug 2024 07:30 |
Last Modified: | 13 Mar 2025 08:45 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/124513 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |