Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Addressing the consequences of the corporatisation of reproductive medicine

Attinger, Sara A., Jackson, Emily, Karpin, Isabel, Kerridge, Ian, Newson, Ainsley J, Stewart, Cameron, van de Wiel, Lucy and Lipworth, Wendy (2024) Addressing the consequences of the corporatisation of reproductive medicine. Medical Law Review. ISSN 0967-0742 (In Press)

[img] Text (Addressing the consequences of the corporatisation of reproductive medicine_19Apr copy) - Accepted Version
Pending embargo until 1 January 2100.

Download (522kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

In Australia and the UK, commercialisation and corporatisation of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have created a marketplace of clinics, products, and services. While this has arguably increased choice for patients, ‘choice’, shaped by commercial imperatives may not mean better-quality care. At present, regulation of clinics (including clinic-corporations) and clinicians focuses on the doctor-patient dyad and the clinic-consumer dyad. Scant attention has been paid to the conflicts between the clinic-corporation’s duty to its shareholders and investors, the medical profession’s duty to the corporations within which they practice, and the obligations of both clinicians and corporations to patients and to health systems. Frameworks of regulation based in corporate governance and business ethics such as stakeholder models and ‘corporate social responsibility’ have well-recognised limits and may not translate well into healthcare settings. This means that existing governance frameworks may not meet the needs of patients or health systems. We argue for the development of novel regulatory approaches that more explicitly characterise the obligations that both corporations and clinicians in corporate environments have to patients and to society, and that promote fulfilment of these obligations. We consider mechanisms for application in the multi-jurisdictional setting of Australia, and the single jurisdictional settings of the UK.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2024 Wiley
Divisions: Law
Subjects: K Law
R Medicine
Date Deposited: 21 May 2024 08:00
Last Modified: 21 Jun 2024 11:06
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/123534

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics