Convicting peaceful protesters: proportionality’s proper place at criminal trial

Martin, Richard ORCID: 0000-0003-4113-4841 (2024) Convicting peaceful protesters: proportionality’s proper place at criminal trial. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 44 (2). pp. 342-375. ISSN 0143-6503

Text (Martin__Convicting-peaceful-protesters--published) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (935kB)

• Author
• Scopus publication

Abstract

Suppose that a defendant’s conviction would amount to an interference with their right to peaceful protest, protected by articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Is a court then obliged to make a conviction turn on a fact-sensitive proportionality assessment justifying the interference? Drawing on the jurisprudence of the domestic and Strasbourg courts, this article argues that the case law has crystallised into two paradigms that provide distinct answers: the ‘justificatory paradigm’ in European human rights law and the ‘offence-centric’ paradigm in domestic law. The article exposes how and why this divergence has developed, what is at stake at the level of constitutional values and how this conflict might be resolved. It is argued that compliance with Strasbourg now depends on the integration of the justificatory paradigm into domestic law. The article imagines how this might be done in a manner sensitive to domestic constitutional values, using the mechanics on offer in the Human Rights Act 1998.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://academic.oup.com/ojls
Additional Information:	© 2024 The Author
Divisions:	Law
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Date Deposited:	22 Apr 2024 11:57
Last Modified:	20 Dec 2024 00:53
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/122723

Actions (login required)

View Item