GRADE Concept 7: issues and insights linking guideline recommendations to trustworthy essential medicine lists

Piggott, Thomas, Moja, Lorenzo, Jenei, Kristina, Kredo, Tamara, Skoetz, Nicole, Banzi, Rita, Trapani, Dario, Leong, Trudy, McCaul, Michael, Lavis, John N., Akl, Elie A., Nonino, Francesco, Iorio, Alfonso, Laurson-Doube, Joanna, Huttner, Benedikt D. and Schünemann, Holger J. (2024) GRADE Concept 7: issues and insights linking guideline recommendations to trustworthy essential medicine lists. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 166. ISSN 0895-4356

Text (Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations concept 7) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB)

• Scopus publication
• Author

Abstract

Objectives: Guidelines and essential medicine lists (EMLs) bear similarities and differences in the process that lead to decisions. Access to essential medicines is central to achieve universal health coverage. The World Health Organization (WHO) EML has guided prioritization of essential medicines globally for nearly 50 years, and national EMLs (NEMLs) exist in over 130 countries. Guideline and EML decisions, at WHO or national levels, are not always coordinated and aligned. We sought to explore challenges, and potential solutions, for decision-making to support trustworthy medicine selection for EMLs from a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) Working Group perspective. We primarily focus on the WHO EML; however, our findings may be applicable to NEML decisions as well. Study Design and Setting: We identified key challenges in connecting the EML to health guidelines by involving a broad group of stakeholders and assessing case studies including real applications to the WHO EML, South Africa NEML, and a multiple sclerosis guideline connected to a WHO EML application for multiple sclerosis treatments. To address challenges, we utilized the results of a survey and feedback from the stakeholders, and iteratively met as a project group. We drafted a conceptual framework of challenges and potential solutions. We presented a summary of the results for feedback to all attendees of the GRADE Working Group meetings in November 2022 (approximately 120 people) and in May 2023 (approximately 100 people) before finalizing the framework. Results: We prioritized issues and insights/solutions that addressed the connections between the EML and health guidelines. Our suggested solutions include early planning alignment of guideline groups and EMLs, considering shared participation to strengthen linkage, further clarity on price/cost considerations, and using explicit shared criteria to make guideline and EML decisions. We also provide recommendations to strengthen the connection between WHO EML and NEMLs including through contextualization methods. Conclusion: This GRADE concept article, jointly developed by key stakeholders from the guidelines and EMLs field, identified key conceptual issues and potential solutions to support the continued advancement of trustworthy EMLs. Adopting structured decision criteria that can be linked to guideline recommendations bears the potential to advance health equity and gaps in availability of essential medicines within and between countries.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://www.jclinepi.com/
Additional Information:	© 2024 The Authors
Divisions:	Health Policy
Subjects:	R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Date Deposited:	02 Feb 2024 11:42
Last Modified:	22 Nov 2024 03:30
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/121639

Actions (login required)

View Item