Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Digital technologies to prevent falls in people living with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a rapid systematic overview of systematic reviews

Eost-Telling, Charlotte, Yang, Yang, Norman, Gill, Hall, Alex, Hanratty, Barbara, Knapp, Martin ORCID: 0000-0003-1427-0215, Robinson, Louise and Todd, Chris (2024) Digital technologies to prevent falls in people living with dementia or mild cognitive impairment: a rapid systematic overview of systematic reviews. Age and Ageing, 53 (1). ISSN 0002-0729

[img] Text (Knapp_digital-technologies-ro-prevent-falls--published) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB)

Identification Number: 10.1093/ageing/afad238

Abstract

Objective Falls are a common cause of potentially preventable death, disability and loss of independence with an annual estimated cost of £4.4bn. People living with dementia (PlwD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) have an increased fall risk. This overview evaluates evidence for technologies aiming to reduce falls and fall risk for PlwD or MCI. Methods In October 2022, we searched five databases for evidence syntheses. We used standard methods to rapidly screen, extract data, assess risk of bias and overlap, and synthesise the evidence for each technology type. Results We included seven systematic reviews, incorporating 22 relevant primary studies with 1,412 unique participants. All reviews had critical flaws on AMSTAR-2: constituent primary studies were small, heterogeneous, mostly non-randomised and assessed as low or moderate quality. Technologies assessed were: wearable sensors, environmental sensor-based systems, exergaming, virtual reality systems. We found no evidence relating to apps. Review evidence for the direct impact on falls was available only from environmental sensors, and this was inconclusive. For wearables and virtual reality technologies there was evidence that technologies may differentiate PlwD who fell from those who did not; and for exergaming that balance may be improved. Conclusions The evidence for technology to reduce falls and falls risk for PlwD and MCI is methodologically weak, based on small numbers of participants and often indirect. There is a need for higher-quality RCTs to provide robust evidence for effectiveness of fall prevention technologies. Such technologies should be designed with input from users and consideration of the wider implementation context.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://academic.oup.com/ageing
Additional Information: © 2024 The Author(s)
Divisions: Care Policy and Evaluation Centre
Health Policy
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Date Deposited: 25 Jan 2024 10:42
Last Modified: 15 Nov 2024 02:48
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/121578

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics