Research ethics and collaborative research in health and social care: analysis of UK research ethics policies, scoping review of the literature, and focus group study

De Poli, Chiara ORCID: 0000-0002-1879-553X and Oyebode, Jan (2023) Research ethics and collaborative research in health and social care: analysis of UK research ethics policies, scoping review of the literature, and focus group study. PLOS ONE, 18 (12). ISSN 1932-6203

Text (Research ethics and collaborative research in health and social care Analysis of UK research ethics policies, scoping review of the literature, and focus group study) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (947kB)

• Scopus publication
• Author

Abstract

Current research ethics frameworks were developed on the footprint of biomedical, experimental research and present several pitfalls when applied to non-experimental social sciences. This work explores how the normative principles underpinning policy and regulatory frameworks of research ethics and the related operational processes work in practice in the context of collaborative health and social care research. The work was organised in three phases. First, UK research ethics policy documents were analysed thematically, with themes further organised under the categories of ‘Principles’ and ‘Processes’. Next, we conducted a scoping review of articles about research ethics in the context of collaborative health and social care research, published in English between 2010 and 2022. We then held an exploratory focus group with ten academic researchers with relevant experience to gather their views on how the research ethics system works in practice in England (UK). The thematic framework developed in the first phase supported the analysis of the articles included in the scoping review and of focus group data. The analysis of policy documents identified twelve themes. All were associated to both a principle and a related operational process. The scoping review identified 31 articles. Across these, some themes were barely acknowledged (e.g., Compliance with legislation). Other themes were extensively covered (e.g., The working of Research Ethics Committees), often to discuss issues and limitations in how, in practice, the research ethics system and its processes deal with collaborative research and to suggest options for improvement. Focus group data were largely consistent with the findings of the scoping review. This work provides evidence of the poor alignment between how the research ethics system is normatively expected to work and how it works in practice and offers options that could make research ethics more fit for purpose when addressing collaborative research in health and social care.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://journals.plos.org/plosone/
Additional Information:	© 2023 The Author(s)
Divisions:	Health Policy LSE
Subjects:	R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine H Social Sciences
Date Deposited:	02 Jan 2024 10:33
Last Modified:	12 Jan 2024 11:45
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/121122

Actions (login required)

View Item