Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Rose's homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative to Neo-Darwinism

Wells, Andrew J. (1999) Rose's homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative to Neo-Darwinism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (5). pp. 911-912. ISSN 0140-525X

PDF - Published Version
Download (674kB) | Preview
Identification Number: 10.1017/S0140525X9951220X


Lifelines discusses two approaches to biology, “ultra-Darwinism” which Rose criticises, and the “homeodynamic perspective,” which he offers as an alternative. This review suggests that ultra-Darwinism is a caricature of the theoretical positions Rose wishes to oppose and that the homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative, but is complementary to so-called ultra-Darwinism.

Item Type: Article
Official URL:
Additional Information: © 1999 Cambridge University Press
Divisions: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects: Q Science > Q Science (General)
Date Deposited: 13 Feb 2010 11:56
Last Modified: 20 Oct 2021 01:33

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics