Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Rose's homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative to Neo-Darwinism

Wells, Andrew J. (1999) Rose's homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative to Neo-Darwinism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (5). pp. 911-912. ISSN 0140-525X

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Download (658Kb) | Preview

Abstract

Lifelines discusses two approaches to biology, “ultra-Darwinism” which Rose criticises, and the “homeodynamic perspective,” which he offers as an alternative. This review suggests that ultra-Darwinism is a caricature of the theoretical positions Rose wishes to oppose and that the homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative, but is complementary to so-called ultra-Darwinism.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJourna...
Additional Information: © 1999 Cambridge University Press
Library of Congress subject classification: Q Science > Q Science (General)
Sets: Departments > Social Psychology
Rights: http://www.lse.ac.uk/library/usingTheLibrary/academicSupport/OA/depositYourResearch.aspx
Date Deposited: 13 Feb 2010 11:56
URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/12103/

Actions (login required)

Record administration - authorised staff only Record administration - authorised staff only