Rose's homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative to Neo-Darwinism

Wells, Andrew J. (1999) Rose's homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative to Neo-Darwinism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (5). pp. 911-912. ISSN 0140-525X

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (674kB) | Preview

Abstract

Lifelines discusses two approaches to biology, “ultra-Darwinism” which Rose criticises, and the “homeodynamic perspective,” which he offers as an alternative. This review suggests that ultra-Darwinism is a caricature of the theoretical positions Rose wishes to oppose and that the homeodynamic perspective is not an alternative, but is complementary to so-called ultra-Darwinism.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJourna...
Additional Information:	© 1999 Cambridge University Press
Divisions:	Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects:	Q Science > Q Science (General)
Date Deposited:	13 Feb 2010 11:56
Last Modified:	13 Sep 2024 21:11
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/12103

Actions (login required)

View Item