Reframing imperial China's indigenous accounting history: further discoveries in archival materials from the three centuries before 1850

Yuan, Weipeng and Macve, Richard ORCID: 0000-0002-0023-948X (2024) Reframing imperial China's indigenous accounting history: further discoveries in archival materials from the three centuries before 1850. Accounting and Business Research, 54 (4). 457 - 490. ISSN 0001-4788

Text (Reframing imperial Chinas indigenous accounting history) - Accepted Version Repository staff only until 22 August 2025. Download (1MB)

• Author
• Scopus publication

Abstract

How far did the indigenous accounting of China's historically successful economy parallel Western double-entry bookkeeping (DEB)? We propose a scheme for classifying stages of bookkeeping that approach full DEB, review recently available nineteenth century Chinese accounting manuals and re-examine how far their recommendations reflect practice to be found in original account books contained in the archives of the Zigong brine wells for 1916-1917 (which have been argued to be essentially unchanged from the nineteenth century Qing era and perhaps earlier) and in the surviving accounts of the Fēngshèngtài salt traders of Henan province spanning 1854-1881. We introduce the accounting records we have now discovered from merchanting businesses in Anhui province, which span 300 years and survive from the 1590s onwards. These are all more sophisticated than the ‘merchant-banking' accounts in the vast archive of Tŏng Tài Shēng covering 1798-1850, and in the case of the Anhui merchants' accounts comprise ‘balance sheets' that include monetary values for physical as well as monetary assets, matching their owners' ‘capital'. We tentatively conclude, on the basis of the evidence now emerging, that despite its variety of forms indigenous Chinese style accounting practice may in some cases have captured the structural essentials of DEB’s content and functions and might be labelled ‘Chinese-style double-entry bookkeeping' ('CDEB'), over which Western bookkeeping had no conceptual advantages.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rabr20
Additional Information:	© 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Divisions:	Accounting
Subjects:	D History General and Old World > D History (General) H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting
JEL classification:	M - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M41 - Accounting N - Economic History > N2 - Financial Markets and Institutions > N25 - Asia including Middle East
Date Deposited:	12 Dec 2023 10:24
Last Modified:	29 Nov 2024 02:30
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/121029

Actions (login required)

View Item