Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Comparative analysis of legal mechanisms to net-zero: lessons from Germany, the United States, Brazil, and China

Merner, Delta, Benjamin, Lisa, Ercole, William, Keuschnigg, Isa, Kunik, Julian, Martínez Toral, Karla, Peterson, Laura, Setzer, Joana ORCID: 0000-0002-7705-7684, Sokol, Karen, Tandon, Aradhna and Turowski, Kaia (2024) Comparative analysis of legal mechanisms to net-zero: lessons from Germany, the United States, Brazil, and China. Carbon Management, 15 (1). ISSN 1758-3004

[img] Text (Comparative analysis of legal mechanisms to net-zero lessons from Germany the United States Brazil and China) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Identification Number: 10.1080/17583004.2023.2288592

Abstract

Amid mushrooming net-zero commitments and pledges made by states and non-state entities, a gap remains between those pledges, and the action needed in order to stay within the temperature goals of the Paris Agreement. In response, scholars and policymakers have started to examine physical, technological, economic, and policy pathways to net‐zero emissions across different sectors. This article examines the existing legislation and litigation for a net-zero world in four jurisdictions: Germany, the United States, Brazil, and China. We propose a taxonomy for identifying and comparing existing legal mechanisms to reach net-zero across these jurisdictions. We identify and analyze different legislative and regulatory mechanisms that incorporate net-zero mandates and three net-zero litigation strategies in these countries. These jurisdictions provide a useful snapshot of the variety of legal mechanisms currently being used by, or imposed on, large emitting jurisdictions and entities. We then consider the critical ways in which climate law can contribute to, or hinder, emissions reductions in line with net-zero targets.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/tcmt20
Additional Information: © 2023 The Author(s)
Divisions: Grantham Research Institute
Subjects: K Law
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Date Deposited: 23 Nov 2023 17:03
Last Modified: 01 Jul 2024 17:57
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/120857

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics