Identifying critical gaps in research to advance global surgery by 2030: a systematic mapping review

Kebede, Meskerem Aleka ORCID: 0009-0007-7427-0897, Tor, Deng Simon Garang, Aklilu, Tesfamariam, Petros, Adane, Ifeanyichi, Martilord ORCID: 0000-0003-0611-6795, Aderaw, Ezekiel, Bognini, Maeve Sophia, Singh, Darshita, Emodi, Rosemary, Hargest, Rachel and Friebel, Rocco ORCID: 0000-0003-1256-9096 (2023) Identifying critical gaps in research to advance global surgery by 2030: a systematic mapping review. BMC Health Services Research, 23 (1). ISSN 1472-6963

Text (Identifying critical gaps in research to advance global surgery by 2030) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB)

• Author
• Author
• Author
• Author
• Scopus publication

Abstract

Progress on surgical system strengthening has been slow due to a disconnect between evidence generation and the information required for effective policymaking. This systematic mapping review sought to assess critical research gaps in the field of global surgery guided by the World Health Organisation Health Systems building block framework, analysis of authorship and funding patterns, and an exploration of emerging research partnership networks. Literature was systematically mapped to identify, screen, and synthesize results of publications in the global surgery field between 2015 and March 2022. We searched four databases and included literature published in seven languages. A social network analysis determined the network attributes of research institutions and their transient relationships in shaping the global surgery research agenda. We identified 2,298 relevant studies out of 92,720 unique articles searched. Research output increased from 453 in 2015-16 to 552 in 2021-22, largely due to literature on Covid-19 impacts on surgery. Sub-Saharan Africa (792/2298) and South Asia (331/2298) were the most studied regions, although high-income countries represented a disproportionate number of first (42%) and last (43%) authors. Service delivery received the most attention, including the surgical burden and quality and safety of services, followed by capacity-building efforts in low- and middle-income countries. Critical research in economics and financing, essential infrastructure and supplies, and surgical leadership necessary to guide policy decisions at the country level were lacking. Global surgical systems remain largely under-researched. Knowledge diffusion requires an emphasis on developing sustainable research partnerships and capacity across low- and middle-income countries. A renewed focus must be given to equipping countries with tools for effective decision-making to enhance investments in high-quality surgical services.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2023 The Author(s)
Divisions:	LSE Health Health Policy
Date Deposited:	07 Sep 2023 23:21
Last Modified:	20 Dec 2024 00:49
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/120183

Actions (login required)

View Item