Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Recognizing and correcting positive bias: the salient victim effect

Zitek, Emily M., Giurge, Laura M. ORCID: 0000-0002-7974-391X and Smith, Isaac H. (2023) Recognizing and correcting positive bias: the salient victim effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 109. ISSN 0022-1031

[img] Text (Recognizing and Correcting Positive Bias The Salient Victim Effect) - Accepted Version
Repository staff only until 19 August 2025.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (550kB) | Request a copy

Identification Number: 10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104522

Abstract

People seem to have stronger disapproving reactions when they have unfairly suffered from bias than when they have unfairly benefited from it (i.e., they seem less concerned when they have experienced positive bias). Is this because people do not care about the consequences of bias if it has positively affected them, or is it because they fail to notice positive bias? We argue that it is the latter, and that increasing awareness of a victim who has been harmed can “remove the blinders” of the beneficiary of bias. Across seven pre-registered studies of American participants, we tested the effect of a salient victim on people who have experienced positive bias. Our results show that when a victim has been made salient, beneficiaries of bias are more likely to recognize and condemn the positive bias, and they are also more likely to act to correct it. We found this salient victim effect when people reflected on their own positive treatment in society, when they benefited from favoritism in interpersonal interactions, and when they imagined benefiting from nepotism. The effect emerged with both direct and indirect manipulations of the victim. Moreover, the presence of a salient victim spurred more action in those who experienced positive bias even when there was a personal cost. We discuss the contributions of our research to the fairness, morality, and bias literatures.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2023 Elsevier Inc.
Divisions: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects: H Social Sciences
J Political Science
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Date Deposited: 07 Sep 2023 15:03
Last Modified: 23 Feb 2024 08:51
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/120179

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics