Assessing the impact of anaesthetic and surgical task-shifting globally: a systematic literature review

Bognini, Maeve S, Oko, Christian I, Kebede, Meskerem A ORCID: 0009-0007-7427-0897, Ifeanyichi, Martilord I, Singh, Darshita, Hargest, Rachel and Friebel, Rocco ORCID: 0000-0003-1256-9096 (2023) Assessing the impact of anaesthetic and surgical task-shifting globally: a systematic literature review. Health Policy and Planning, 38 (8). 960 - 994. ISSN 0268-1080

Text (Assessing the impact of anaesthetic and surgical task shifting globally: a systematic literature review) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB)

• Author
• Scopus publication

Abstract

The global shortage of skilled anaesthesiologists, surgeons and obstetricians is a leading cause of high unmet surgical need. Although anaesthetic and surgical task-shifting are widely practised to mitigate this barrier, little is known about their safety and efficacy. This systematic review seeks to highlight the existing evidence on the clinical outcomes of patients operated on by non-physicians or non-specialist physicians globally. Relevant articles were identified by searching four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Global Health) in all languages between January 2008 and February 2022. Retrieved documents were screened against pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their qualities were appraised critically. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and findings were synthesized narratively. In total, 40 studies have been included. Thirty-five focus on task-shifting for surgical and obstetric procedures, whereas four studies address anaesthetic task-shifting; one study covers both interventions. The majority are located in sub-Saharan Africa and the USA. Seventy-five per cent present perioperative mortality outcomes and 85% analyse morbidity measures. Evidence from low- and middle-income countries, which primarily concentrates on caesarean sections, hernia repairs and surgical male circumcisions, points to the overall safety of non-surgeons. On the other hand, the literature on surgical task-shifting in high-income countries (HICs) is limited to nine studies analysing tube thoracostomies, neurosurgical procedures, caesarean sections, male circumcisions and basal cell carcinoma excisions. Finally, only five studies pertaining to anaesthetic task-shifting across all country settings answer the research question with conflicting results, making it difficult to draw conclusions on the quality of non-physician anaesthetic care. Overall, it appears that non-specialists can safely perform high-volume, low-complexity operations. Further research is needed to understand the implications of surgical task-shifting in HICs and to better assess the performance of non-specialist anaesthesia providers. Future studies must adopt randomized study designs and include long-term outcome measures to generate high-quality evidence.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://academic.oup.com/heapol
Additional Information:	© 2023 The Author(s)
Divisions:	LSE Health Health Policy
Subjects:	R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Date Deposited:	06 Sep 2023 10:00
Last Modified:	18 Nov 2024 23:30
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/120164

Actions (login required)

View Item