Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Income source confusion using the SILC

Bollinger, Christopher R. and Tasseva, Iva ORCID: 0000-0003-3302-8918 (2023) Income source confusion using the SILC. Public Opinion Quarterly, 87 (S1). 542 – 574. ISSN 0033-362X

[img] Text (Income source confusion using the SILC) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (275kB)

Identification Number: 10.1093/poq/nfad025

Abstract

We use a unique panel of household survey data—the Austrian version of the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) for 2008–2011—which have been linked to individual administrative records on both state unemployment benefits and earnings. We assess the extent and structure of misreporting across similar benefits and between benefits and earnings. We document that many respondents fail to report participation in one or more of the unemployment programs. Moreover, they inflate earnings for periods when they are unemployed but receiving unemployment compensation. To demonstrate the impact of income source confusion on estimators, we estimate standard Mincer wage equations. Since unemployment is associated with lower education, the reports of unemployment benefits as earnings bias downward the returns to education. Failure to report unemployment benefits also leads to substantial sample bias when selecting on these benefits, as one might in estimating the returns to job training.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://academic.oup.com/poq
Additional Information: © 2023 The Authors
Divisions: Social Policy
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
H Social Sciences
Date Deposited: 06 Jun 2023 15:24
Last Modified: 23 Feb 2024 18:54
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/119351

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics