Measuring mathematics self-efficacy: multitrait-multimethod comparison

Yu, Wenhua, Zhou, Shuodi and Zhou, Yu (2023) Measuring mathematics self-efficacy: multitrait-multimethod comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. ISSN 1664-1078

Text (Measuring mathematics self-efficacy) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (784kB)

Abstract

Previous studies had shown that there is a certain relationship between mathematics self-efficacy and math performance. For students, parents, and front-line scholars, it is urgent and important to study the measurement relationship between math achievement and self-efficacy. The research aimed to observe how to measure mathematics self-efficacy and find which of the three traits and which of the three methods better reflect individuals’ self-efficacy. The present study used a multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) design to measure mathematics self-efficacy by constructing the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) model. “Number and Algebra,” “Graphics and Geometry,” and “Synthesis and Practice” were considered three traits, and General-Math-Task-referenced self-efficacy, Unconventional-Math-Problem-referenced self-efficacy, and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) self-efficacy were discussed as three methods to study. A questionnaire survey was used to obtain data. A total of 100 students completed all the questionnaires. Excel was used to collect math scores, and SPSS version 26.0 and AMOS version 26.0 were used to manage the data, confirm a hypothesis, and build a model by using MTMM design and CFA. CFA was used to verify convergent validity and discriminant validity. A total of eight models were constructed in the study that includes first-order CFA models and second-order CFA models, and model D was finally selected as the most perfect model in the second-order CFA model. The results showed that the “Synthesis and Practice” fields were the most significant reflection of self-efficacy among the three traits. MSLQ was the most significant reflection of self-efficacy among the three methods. It is beneficial to improve the level of self-efficacy from the aspect of mathematics subject. In addition, the research confirmed that CFA can support MTMM data for data modeling and found that the correlation between the Unconventional-Math-Problem-referenced self-efficacy and MSLQ is higher than that of General-Math-Task-referenced self-efficacy in the second-order model. It makes certain theoretical significance for improving students’ mathematics self-efficacy levels.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology
Additional Information:	© 2023 The Authors
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	Q Science > QA Mathematics B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Date Deposited:	31 Mar 2023 14:24
Last Modified:	18 Nov 2024 18:48
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/118575

Actions (login required)

View Item