Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

A critical reading of the European Union’s social innovation policy discourse: (re)legitimizing neoliberalism

Fougère, Martin, Segercrantz, Beata and Seeck, Hannele (2017) A critical reading of the European Union’s social innovation policy discourse: (re)legitimizing neoliberalism. Organization, 24 (6). 819 - 843. ISSN 1350-5084

Full text not available from this repository.

Identification Number: 10.1177/1350508416685171

Abstract

In this article, we conduct a critical reading of the European Union social innovation policy discourse. We argue that rather than being a transformative discourse within European Union policy, European Union social innovation policy discourse reinforces neoliberal hegemony by (re)legitimizing it. Inspired by post-foundational discourse theory and Glynos and Howarth’s logics of critical explanation, we analyse three central European Union social innovation policy documents. We characterize what kind of political project is articulated in and through European Union social innovation policy discourse, and uncover how it relates to neoliberal political rationality. Our contribution lies in showing (1) how the social logics of European Union social innovation policy can be understood as both ‘roll-out’ and ‘roll-with-it’ neoliberalization, thereby relegitimizing and naturalizing neoliberalism; (2) how the political logics of European Union social innovation policy pre-empt the critique of ‘roll-back’ neoliberalization and thus legitimize decreased public expenditure; and (3) how the fantasmatic logics make European Union social innovation policy ideologically useful in relegitimizing neoliberalism through the win-win-win fantasy and the ethical responsibilization of subjects. We argue that resisting the neoliberalizing power of European Union social innovation policy discourse implies resisting the fantasmatic grip of social innovation as carrying a sublime win-win-win. Instead of accepting social innovation as driven by a replication of best practices, we need to understand social innovations as conceived and suited for particular social issues in particular contexts: we call for a different win-win mindset that does not blind innovators to possible negative impacts of social innovations.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/ORG
Additional Information: © 2017 The Author(s).
Divisions: Media and Communications
Subjects: J Political Science > JC Political theory
J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe)
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Date Deposited: 23 Mar 2023 13:00
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2024 05:21
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/118485

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item