Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Standpoint theory and middle-range theorizing in international sociology

Krause, Monika ORCID: 0000-0002-8699-5496 (2023) Standpoint theory and middle-range theorizing in international sociology. British Journal of Sociology, 74 (3). pp. 336-344. ISSN 0007-1315

[img] Text (British Journal of Sociology - 2023 - Krause - Standpoint theory and middle‐range theorizing in International Sociology) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (189kB)

Identification Number: 10.1111/1468-4446.13011

Abstract

This paper responds to Julian Go's Lecture “Thinking against Empire. Anti-colonial Thought and Social Theory.” It proceeds in two parts: I first follow Go's invitation to read and reread Mabel Dove Danquah and Frantz Fanon and explore what their work contributes to our understanding of state-forms. I then examine the terms of Go's invitation more closely. I contrast Go's juxtaposition of imperial sociology on the one hand and anti-colonial sociology on the other hand, with the broader range of theoretical traditions and methods, which a practice-oriented sociology of sociology and an international history of sociology would highlight. I raise the question what “standpoint” adds to the authors Go discusses and the broader range of scholars who have engaged with post-colonial contexts in their research at this point in time. Calling for consideration of the anti-colonial standpoint is a particular choice, which has a distinctive heritage in Hegelian-Marxian projections of the social whole and is in tension with either deep exploration of particular thinkers or the middle-range theorizing that Go also seems to endorse. Defined at a level of abstraction that is “above” (or underneath) actual conversations in a range of fields and subfields, it can appear as a “test” for scholars who have long engaged with post-colonial contexts, which can have unintended consequences when coupled with the institutional power and asymmetric insularity of Anglo-American academia.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2023 The Author.
Divisions: Sociology
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Date Deposited: 09 Mar 2023 17:03
Last Modified: 12 Dec 2024 03:38
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/118375

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics