Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

When the disposition effect proves to be rational: experimental evidence from professional traders

Guenther, Benno and Lordan, Grace (2023) When the disposition effect proves to be rational: experimental evidence from professional traders. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. ISSN 1664-1078

[img] Text (When the disposition effect proves to be rational. Experimental evidence from professional traders) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (611kB)

Identification Number: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1091922

Abstract

The disposition effect is a behavioural finance anomaly that has been observed in many populations including non-professional investors as well as professional investors and has been linked to reduced trading performance. However, the majority of studies to date have looked at the disposition effect in the context of non-mean reverting markets. We conducted a within-subject experiment with n  = 193 professional traders, to examine how the tendency towards the disposition effect varies across decision-making for mean reverting securities and non-mean reverting securities. In addition, we consider whether a simple informational intervention that makes the disposition effect salient can alter decision-making. Overall, we find that prior to the intervention the traders exhibit the disposition effect in the direction that aligns with profit maximisation goals suggesting that they are acting rational. For decisions on mean reverting securities the traders tend to make decisions in the direction of the disposition effect, which is rational given their mean reverting properties. We also find that the informational intervention is effective in changing the level of the disposition effect observed and decision-making, regardless of whether traders are considering decisions over mean reverting or non-mean reverting securities. Further, we provide evidence that our simple informational intervention improves trader returns when making decisions on non-mean reverting securities. In contrast, it has a negative impact when utilised for mean reverting securities. Our study highlights the power of simple interventions to make disproportionately large changes to decision-making regardless of whether they are in our best interests, and their beneficial role only when the context is right.

Item Type: Article
Official URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology
Additional Information: © 2023 The Authors
Divisions: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > HG Finance
JEL classification: G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
Date Deposited: 07 Mar 2023 09:42
Last Modified: 15 Apr 2024 21:12
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/118353

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics