Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Should we adjust health expenditure for age structure on health systems efficiency? A worldwide analysis

Santos, João Vasco, Martins, Filipa Santos, Pestana, Joana, Souza, Júlio, Freitas, Alberto and Cylus, Jonathan ORCID: 0000-0001-8269-1578 (2023) Should we adjust health expenditure for age structure on health systems efficiency? A worldwide analysis. Health Economics Review, 13 (1). p. 11. ISSN 2191-1991

[img] Text (Should we adjust health expenditure for age structure on health systems efficiency?) - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Identification Number: 10.1186/s13561-023-00421-2

Abstract

Introduction: Healthcare expenditure, a common input used in health systems efficiency analyses is affected by population age structure. However, while age structure is usually considered to adjust health system outputs, health expenditure and other inputs are seldom adjusted. We propose methods for adjusting Health Expenditure per Capita (HEpC) for population age structure on health system efficiency analyses and assess the goodness-of-fit, correlation, reliability and disagreement of different approaches. Methods: We performed a worldwide (188 countries) cross-sectional study of efficiency in 2015, using a stochastic frontier analysis. As single outputs, healthy life expectancy (HALE) at birth and at 65 years-old were considered in different models. We developed five models using as inputs: (1) HEpC (unadjusted); (2) age-adjusted HEpC; (3) HEpC and the proportion of 0–14, 15–64 and 65 + years-old; (4) HEpC and 5-year age-groups; and (5) HEpC ageing index. Akaike and Bayesian information criteria, Spearman’s rank correlation, intraclass correlation coefficient and information-based measure of disagreement were computed. Results: Models 1 and 2 showed the highest correlation (0.981 and 0.986 for HALE at birth and HALE at 65 years-old, respectively) and reliability (0.986 and 0.988) and the lowest disagreement (0.011 and 0.014). Model 2, with age-adjusted HEpC, presented the lowest information criteria values. Conclusions: Despite different models showing good correlation and reliability and low disagreement, there was important variability when age structure is considered that cannot be disregarded. The age-adjusted HE model provided the best goodness-of-fit and was the closest option to the current standard.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2023, The Author(s).
Divisions: Health Policy
European Observatory on Health Systems
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
JEL classification: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I10 - General
Date Deposited: 01 Mar 2023 14:42
Last Modified: 16 Jun 2024 20:48
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/118298

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics