Publishing while female: are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review

Hengel, Erin (2022) Publishing while female: are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. The Economic Journal, 132 (648). pp. 2951-2991. ISSN 0013-0133

Text (Publishing while female) - Accepted Version Download (999kB)

• Author
• https://academic.oup.com/ej/article/132/...

Abstract

Female authors are under-represented in top economics journals. In this paper, I investigate whether higher writing standards contribute to the problem. I find that (i) female-authored papers are 1%–6% better written than equivalent papers by men; (ii) the gap widens during peer review; (iii) women improve their writing as they publish more papers (but men do not); (iv) female-authored papers take longer under review. Using a subjective expected utility framework, I argue that higher writing standards for women are consistent with these stylised facts. A counterfactual analysis suggests that senior female economists may, as a result, write at least 5% more clearly than they otherwise would. As a final exercise, I show tentative evidence that women adapt to biased treatment in ways that may disguise it as voluntary choice.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	© 2023 Oxford University Press.
Divisions:	Social Policy
Subjects:	H Social Sciences
Date Deposited:	20 Feb 2023 16:06
Last Modified:	17 Nov 2024 02:30
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/118208

Actions (login required)

View Item