The curious case of the jury-shaped hole: a plea for real jury research

Ross, Lewis ORCID: 0000-0001-9683-9924 (2023) The curious case of the jury-shaped hole: a plea for real jury research. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 27 (2). 107 - 125. ISSN 1365-7127

Text (Ross_curious-case-of-the-jury-shaped-hole--published) - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (662kB)

• Scopus publication

Abstract

Criminal juries make decisions of great importance. A key criticism of juries is that they are unreliable in a multitude of ways, from exhibiting racial or gendered biases, to misunderstanding their role, to engaging in impropriety such as internet research. Recently, some have even claimed that the use of juries creates injustice on a large scale, as a cause of low conviction rates for sexual criminality. Unfortunately, empirical research into jury deliberation is undermined by the fact that researchers are unable to study live juries. The indirect sources of evidence used by researchers suffer from various problems, the most important of which is dubious levels of ecological validity. Real jury research—studying live jury deliberation—is controversial. However, as I argue, the objections to it are unconvincing. There is in fact a moral imperative to facilitate real jury research.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://journals.sagepub.com/home/EPJ
Additional Information:	© 2023 The Author
Divisions:	Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General) B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Date Deposited:	05 Jan 2023 13:06
Last Modified:	18 Nov 2024 08:42
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/117721

Actions (login required)

View Item