Sartori, Lorenzo ORCID: 0000-0002-8457-7100 (2023) Putting the experiment back into the thought experiment. Synthese, 201 (2). ISSN 1573-0964
Text (Sartori__Thought-experiment--published)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (485kB) |
Abstract
Philosophers have debated at length the epistemological status of scientific thought experiments. I contend that the literature on this topic still lacks a common conceptual framework, a lacuna that produces radical disagreement among the participants in this debate. To remedy this problem, I suggest focusing on the distinction between the internal and the external validity of an experiment, which is also crucial for thought experiments. I then develop an account of both kinds of validity in the context of thought experiments. I show that we can naturally conceptualise internal validity in terms of games of make-believe. Then, I argue that external validity is best defined as accurate representation of a target system. Finally, I turn back to the current debate on thought experiments and show that my diarchic account provides a general framework that can be shared by the competing philosophical views, as well as a fruitful guide for their reconciliation.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://link.springer.com/journal/11229/volumes-an... |
Additional Information: | © 2023 The Author |
Divisions: | Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General) |
Date Deposited: | 12 Dec 2022 16:18 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2024 16:45 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/117586 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |