Malley, Juliette ORCID: 0000-0001-5759-1647, Bauer, Annette ORCID: 0000-0001-5156-1631, Boaz, Annette and Kendrick, Hannah ORCID: 0000-0001-9026-236X (2022) Theory-based evaluation of three research–practice partnerships designed to deliver novel, sustainable collaborations between adult social care research and practice in the UK: a research protocol for a ‘layered’ contributions analysis and realist evaluation. BMJ Open, 12 (11). ISSN 2044-6055
Text (Malley_theory-based-evaluation--published)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (817kB) |
Abstract
Introduction Research-practice partnerships (RPPs) are long-term collaborations between research and practice that aim to conduct research that can be used to make practice-based improvements. They intentionally bring together diverse experience in decision making and seek to shift power dynamics so that all partners have a say. The Creating Care Partnerships project aims to explore whether the RPP approach developed within the US educational context can be successfully applied to the English care home context. The project involves a programme of codesign, implementation and evaluation within three case study sites. This protocol set outs the aims, research design and governance of the evaluation. Methods and analysis The evaluation takes a theory-based approach to explore how, why and in what circumstances RPPs in the care home context contribute to enhancing research and research use in local care homes and informing wider improvement efforts. A mixed-methods design will be used for each case study, including semistructured interviews, observations of RPP events and meetings, an online survey, activity diary and review of local data and documents. Data collection will proceed in waves, with the theory of change (ToC) being continually refined and used to guide further data collection and analysis. Insights will be drawn using Contribution Analysis, Realist Evaluation and systems perspectives to assess the contribution made by the case study sites to achieving outcomes and the influence of contextual factors. Economic consequences will be identified through the ToC, using a narrative economic analysis to assess costs, consequences and value for money. Ethics and dissemination The study has undergone ethics review by HRA Research Ethics Committee. It does not pose major ethical issues. A final report will be published and articles will be submitted to international journals.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/ |
Additional Information: | © 2022 The Authors |
Divisions: | Care Policy and Evaluation Centre |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine |
Date Deposited: | 16 Nov 2022 15:06 |
Last Modified: | 02 Nov 2024 22:39 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/117352 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |