Neumayer, Eric ORCID: 0000-0003-2719-7563 and Plümper, Thomas (2022) Does ‘data fudging’ explain the autocratic advantage? Evidence from the gap between official Covid-19 mortality and excess mortality. SSM - Population Health, 19. ISSN 2352-8273
Text (1-s2.0-S2352827322002269-main)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (911kB) |
Abstract
Governments can underreport Covid-19 mortality to make their performance appear more successful than it is. Autocracies are more likely to ‘fudge’ these data since many autocratic regimes restrict media freedom and thus can prevent domestic media from reporting evidence of undercounting deaths. Autocracies also enjoy greater leverage over reporting health authorities to either fudge data or adopt restrictive definitions of what constitutes Covid-19 mortality. Controlling for other factors that explain official Covid-19 mortality, excess mortality and the difference between the two, our results suggest that any apparent ‘autocratic advantage’ in fighting the pandemic is likely to only exist in official Covid-19 mortality. Analyzing the gap between excess mortality and official Covid-19 mortality we find that autocracies on average have a larger gap between official Covid-19 mortality data and excess mortality data, which points towards ‘autocratic data fudging’ of their official Covid-19 mortality statistics.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/ssm-populati... |
Additional Information: | © 2022 The Authors. |
Divisions: | Geography & Environment |
Subjects: | R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology |
Date Deposited: | 03 Oct 2022 09:15 |
Last Modified: | 16 Nov 2024 22:15 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/116875 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |