A pyrrhic victory for unjust enrichment in Singapore? Esben Finance Ltd v Wong Hou-Lianq Neil

Leow, Rachel ORCID: 0000-0002-5182-4830 and Liau, Tim ORCID: 0000-0003-1243-970X (2023) A pyrrhic victory for unjust enrichment in Singapore? Esben Finance Ltd v Wong Hou-Lianq Neil. Modern Law Review, 86 (2). 518 - 535. ISSN 0026-7961

Text (Leow and Liau - A Pyrrhic Victory for Unjust Enrichment revised clean) - Accepted Version Download (422kB)

• Author
• Author

Abstract

In Esben Finance Ltd v Wong Hou-Lianq Neil (Esben) the Singapore Court of Appeal handed down a momentous judgment, holding that, unlike in England and Wales, unjust enrichment claims in Singapore could not be time-barred under the Limitation Act, laches would not apply, and ‘lack of consent’ should be accepted as an unjust factor, subject to circumscribed limits. These are novel stances, unheard of anywhere else in the common law world. We suggest, moreover, that Esben is of potentially greater significance: it is important evidence that Singapore has adopted a distinctive approach towards unjust enrichment. Under this gradually crystallising vision, unjust enrichment is characterised as a new area of law, with independent status but only an interstitial role. This vision, which draws a sharp divide between common law and equity and places unjust enrichment under the common law umbrella, is likely to have far-reaching consequences for the subject's future development.

Item Type:	Article
Official URL:	https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14682230
Additional Information:	© 2022 The Authors
Divisions:	Law
Subjects:	K Law > K Law (General)
Date Deposited:	21 Sep 2022 08:45
Last Modified:	20 Dec 2024 00:45
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/116643

Actions (login required)

View Item