The case against revise and resubmit

Williams, Christine L. (2022) The case against revise and resubmit. Impact of Social Sciences Blog (26 May 2022). Blog Entry.

Text (impactofsocialsciences-2022-05-26-the-case-against-revise-and) - Published Version Download (171kB)

• https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsc...

Abstract

Extensive revising is required by many journals in the social sciences. It is expected that authors “revise and resubmit” (R&R) their manuscripts several times before they are accepted for publication, a process that is time consuming, demoralising, and stifling of creativity. In this post, Christine L. Williams discusses the potential benefits and drawbacks of abolishing the R&R as an option for journal editors.

Item Type:	Online resource (Blog Entry)
Official URL:	https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/
Additional Information:	© 2022 The Author
Divisions:	LSE
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HM Sociology H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > Z004 Books. Writing. Paleography
Date Deposited:	06 Sep 2022 12:18
Last Modified:	14 Sep 2024 03:39
URI:	http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/116266

Actions (login required)

View Item