Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Why do health technology assessment drug reimbursement recommendations differ between countries? A parallel convergent mixed methods study

Nicod, Elena, Maynou, Laia ORCID: 0000-0002-0447-2959, Visintin, Erica and Cairns, John (2019) Why do health technology assessment drug reimbursement recommendations differ between countries? A parallel convergent mixed methods study. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 15 (3). pp. 386-402. ISSN 1744-1331

Full text not available from this repository.

Identification Number: 10.1017/S1744133119000239

Abstract

Using quantitative and qualitative research designs, respectively, two studies investigated why countries make different health technology assessment (HTA) drug reimbursement recommendations. Building on these, the objective of this study was to (a) develop a conceptual framework integrating the factors explaining these decisions, (b) explore their relationship and (c) assess if they are congruent, complementary or discrepant. A parallel convergent mixed methods design was used. Countries included in both previous studies were selected (England, Sweden, Scotland and France). A conceptual framework that integrated and organised the factors explaining the decisions from the two studies was developed. Relationships between factors were explored and illustrated through case studies. The framework distinguishes macro-level factors from micro-level ones. Only two of the factors common to both studies were congruent, while two others reached discrepant conclusions (stakeholder input and external review of the evidence processes). The remaining factors identified within one or both studies were complementary. Bringing together these findings contributed to generating a more complete picture of why countries make different HTA recommendations. Results were mostly complementary, explaining and enhancing each other. We conclude that differences often result from a combination of factors, with an important component relating to what occurs during the deliberative process.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2019 Cambridge University Press.
Divisions: Health Policy
Social Policy
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine
Date Deposited: 18 Aug 2022 14:36
Last Modified: 18 Aug 2022 14:36
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/116028

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item