Zaun, Natascha ORCID: 0000-0002-0436-6275 and Ripoll Servent, Ariadna (2023) Perpetuating crisis as a supply strategy: the role of (nativist) populist governments in EU policymaking on refugee distribution. Journal of Common Market Studies, 61 (3). 653 - 672. ISSN 0021-9886
Text (Zaun_perpetuating-crisis-as-a-supply-strategy--published)
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (332kB) |
Abstract
We still know very little of how populist governments behave as compared to mainstream governments in Council decision-making. Studying the ‘crucial case’ of negotiations around refugee distribution in the EU, an issue which allows populists to mobilize both anti-EU and anti-immigrant sentiment, we demonstrate that populist governments differ from mainstream ones in three important ways: First, they reject formal and informal rules of Council decision-making if these are not conducive to their preferred outcome; second, they reject traditional means of ensuring compromise such as package-deals and side-payments; third, they reject the final solution and exploit the ensuing deadlock to prove that the EU is weak and dysfunctional. We show that populist governments adopt such a behaviour even when they would benefit from the adoption of a policy solution. However, we expect populists to engage in such political games only when the negative effects of non-decisions are not immediate.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Official URL: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14685965 |
Additional Information: | © 2022 The Authors |
Divisions: | European Institute |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JZ International relations J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) J Political Science > JC Political theory |
Date Deposited: | 17 Aug 2022 11:48 |
Last Modified: | 18 Nov 2024 08:00 |
URI: | http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/116008 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |