Cookies?
Library Header Image
LSE Research Online LSE Library Services

Climate models and robustness analysis – part II: the justificatory challenge

Harris, Margherita and Frigg, Roman ORCID: 0000-0003-0812-0907 (2022) Climate models and robustness analysis – part II: the justificatory challenge. In: Pellegrino, Gianfranco and Di Paola, Marcello, (eds.) Handbook of the Philosophy of Climate Change. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Cham, CH. (In Press)

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Robustness analysis (RA) is the prescription to consider a diverse range of evidence and only regard a hypothesis as well-supported if all the evidence agrees on it. In contexts like climate science, the evidence in support of a hypothesis often comes from scientific models. This leads to model-based RA (MBRA), whose core notion is that a hypothesis ought to be regarded as well-supported on grounds that a sufficiently diverse set of models agrees on the hypothesis. This chapter, which is the second part of a two-part review of MBRA, addresses the thorny issue of justifying the inferential steps taking us from the premises to the conclusions. We begin by making explicit what exactly the problem is. We then turn to a discussion of two broad families of justificatory strategies, namely top-down and bottom-up justifications. In the latter group we distinguish between the likelihood approach, independence approaches, and the explanatory approach. This discussion leads us to the sober conclusion that multi-model situations raise issues that are not yet fully understood and that the methods and approaches that MBRA has not yet reached a stage of maturity. Important questions remain open, and these will have to be addressed in future research.

Item Type: Book Section
Official URL: https://link.springer.com/book/9783031070013
Additional Information: © 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
Divisions: Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Q Science > Q Science (General)
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Date Deposited: 17 Aug 2022 09:30
Last Modified: 14 Sep 2024 10:19
URI: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/116005

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item